<em>Radiologic Technology</em>
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Radiologic Technology, 77:32-40 2005
© 2005 American Society of Radiologic Technologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BRINDHABAN, A.
Right arrow Articles by AL KHALIFAH, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BRINDHABAN, A.
Right arrow Articles by AL KHALIFAH, K.

PEER REVIEW

Radiation Dose in Pelvic Imaging

AJIT BRINDHABAN, Ph.D. and KHALED AL KHALIFAH, Ph.D.

Objective To compare the radiation dose during pelvic x-ray examinations using computed radiography (CR) and film-screen (FS) radiography at various x-ray tube voltages (kV) and tube-current time product (mAs) values.

Methods A pelvic phantom was imaged using FS and CR systems. The entrance surface dose was measured using an ionization chamber, and the gonadal dose and effective dose were calculated using the XDOSE program. The diagnostic quality of the images was assessed using a 5-point subjective scoring system.

Results At standard kV values, the image quality did not vary significantly between the CR and the FS system, but at higher kV values, the CR images were found to be of better quality than FS images. In addition, the lower limit of entrance skin dose consistent with diagnostically acceptable CR images was 50% lower than that for FS images.

Conclusion The gonadal dose and effective dose for pelvic x-ray examinations can be reduced by 50% when CR systems are used and appropriate exposure factors are established.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Radiologic Technologists.